Prokuroria ka theksuar se nuk ka asnj\u00eb arsye q\u00eb ky raport t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohet nga provat e procesit, pavar\u00ebsisht se Abrahams deklaroi q\u00eb n\u00eb raportin e tij ka pasur burime nga mediat dhe institucionet e Serbis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dit\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb avokati Emmerson k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb raporti i organizat\u00ebs \u201cHuman Rights Watch\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohet nga provat q\u00eb jan\u00eb pranuar n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb d\u00ebshmis\u00eb s\u00eb Abrahams. Kjo pasi ai e ka pranuar q\u00eb ka nd\u00ebrtuar informacione t\u00eb cilat nuk i ka pare vet\u00eb, dhe detaje q\u00eb jan\u00eb marr\u00eb nga mediat dhe qeveria e Serbis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Megjithat\u00eb, beteja p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb tem\u00eb po vazhdon. Tash, Prokuroria e Hag\u00ebs ka vler\u00ebsuar se raporti \u00ebsht\u00eb i nd\u00ebrtuar sipas rregullave.<\/p>\n
\u201cM\u00eb tej, marrja n\u00eb pyetje e t\u00ebrthort\u00eb e W04408 nuk ndikon n\u00eb arsyet p\u00ebr Vendimin e Pranimit, ose nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn nj\u00eb fakt apo argument t\u00eb ri relevant p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00ebse pragu p\u00ebr rishqyrtim \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur. N\u00eb fakt, si\u00e7 pranohet nga Mbrojtja, Trupi Gjykues kishte shqyrtuar tashm\u00eb shpjegimet e d\u00ebshmitarit se P380 ‘mb\u00ebshtetet m\u00eb shum\u00eb dhe kryesisht n\u00eb burime dyt\u00ebsore’. W04408 shpjegoi se ishte e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb arsyesh, ku kryesore ishte ‘siguria’, t\u00eb hetoheshin burimet e drejtp\u00ebrdrejta, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht, d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebt dhe viktimat n\u00eb lidhje me shkeljet e supozuara nga U\u00c7K-ja. M\u00eb tej, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me argumentet e mbrojtjes, d\u00ebshmit\u00eb e W04408 mbi metodologjin\u00eb e miratuar n\u00eb lidhje me P380 nuk ndryshuan n\u00eb marrjen n\u00eb pyetje t\u00eb t\u00ebrthort\u00eb, ishin t\u00eb qarta dhe t\u00eb q\u00ebndrueshme gjat\u00eb gjith\u00eb d\u00ebshmis\u00eb s\u00eb tij, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb para Vendimi i pranimit\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0thuhet n\u00eb parashtrimin e Prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb Hag\u00ebs, raporton Nacionale.<\/p>\n
\u201cPaneli ka theksuar se do t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb konstatimet e veta mbi pranueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb dhe pesh\u00ebn p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb provave,29 dhe vendimet e lidhura me gjykatat tjera kan\u00eb vler\u00eb t\u00eb kufizuar. Vendimet e pranueshm\u00ebris\u00eb jan\u00eb diskrecionale dhe duhet t\u00eb merren rast pas Baza e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes. Prandaj, nj\u00eb vendim procedural (pranueshm\u00ebrie) n\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje tjet\u00ebr p\u00ebrpara nj\u00eb gjykate tjet\u00ebr, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i mjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur testin p\u00ebr rishqyrtim\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0thuhet m\u00eb tutje.<\/p>\n
\u201cMbrojtja mund t\u00eb argumentoj\u00eb, nd\u00ebr t\u00eb tjera, n\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhjen e saj p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb gjykimit dhe argumentet p\u00ebrfundimtare n\u00eb lidhje me vler\u00ebn p\u00ebrfundimtare provuese t\u00eb P380, e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje q\u00eb Trupi Gjykues do ta vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb kur t\u00eb caktoj\u00eb pesh\u00ebn n\u00eb drit\u00ebn e t\u00eb gjith\u00eb procesverbalit t\u00eb provave. Parashtresa t\u00eb tilla p\u00ebr pesh\u00ebn p\u00ebrfundimtare jan\u00eb t\u00eb ndara dhe t\u00eb dallueshme nga vendimi i Trupit Gjykues p\u00ebr pranimin e provave\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0pretendon Prokuroria.<\/p>\n\u00c7far\u00eb k\u00ebrkoi avokati Ben Emmerson?<\/h3>\n
Raporti i hulumtuesit t\u00eb Human Rights Watsh, Fred Abrahams, p\u00ebr vrasjet e pretenduara t\u00eb civil\u00ebve nga Ushtria \u00c7lirimtare e Kosov\u00ebs, ishte pranuar si prov\u00eb n\u00eb gjykimin e krer\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb n\u00eb Hag\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb, pas d\u00ebshmis\u00eb s\u00eb Abrahams fizikisht n\u00eb sall\u00ebn e gjyqit, mbrojtja e krer\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb po k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb kjo prove t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohet nga procesi.<\/p>\n
Sipas avokatit t\u00eb Kadri Veselit, Ben Emmerson, p\u00ebr hartimin e k\u00ebtij raporti q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb si prove n\u00eb gjykim, d\u00ebshmitari Abrahams e ka pranuar edhe vet\u00eb q\u00eb ka p\u00ebrdorur raporte nga mediat serbe dhe komunikata nga Qeveria e Serbis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb parashtrimin q\u00eb e ka b\u00ebr\u00eb Emmerson me p\u00ebrkrahjen edhe t\u00eb avokat\u00ebve t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb krer\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb, thuhet se i gjith\u00eb raporti \u00ebsht\u00eb hartuar me burime dyt\u00ebsore e tret\u00ebsore. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb avokatit britanik t\u00eb cil\u00ebn e ka pare Nacionale, theksohet se n\u00ebse ky raport mbetet si prov\u00eb, cenohet e drejta e Kadri Veselit p\u00ebr gjykim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u201cAvokati i z. Veseli e kund\u00ebrshtoi pranimin e tij n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se, sipas d\u00ebshmis\u00eb s\u00eb vet\u00eb d\u00ebshmitarit, gjetjet e raportit bazoheshin n\u00eb thashetheme t\u00eb patestueshme q\u00eb e b\u00ebnin at\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb pabesuesh\u00ebm dhe, p\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, raporti ishte krijuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb paraqitur nj\u00eb argument p\u00ebr U\u00c7K-n\u00eb q\u00eb ndodh t\u00eb p\u00ebrkoj\u00eb me rastin e Prokuroris\u00eb \u2013 duke e b\u00ebr\u00eb at\u00eb shum\u00eb paragjykues.Kund\u00ebrshtimit iu bashkuan avokati i z. Tha\u00e7i dhe avokati i z. Krasniqi\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0thuhet n\u00eb start t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj parashtrese.<\/p>\n
\u201cN\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje t\u00eb pyetjeve n\u00eb lidhje me origjin\u00ebn e informacionit t\u00eb cituar n\u00eb P380, d\u00ebshmitari pranoi n\u00eb Prokurori se ai mb\u00ebshtetej “kryesisht n\u00eb burime dyt\u00ebsore” sepse, sipas tij, ishte “e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb” t\u00eb kryheshin hetime t\u00eb dor\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb p\u00ebr krimet e supozuara t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0thuhet m\u00eb tutje, raporton Nacionale.<\/p>\n
Sipas parashtrimit t\u00eb Emmeron, vet\u00eb d\u00ebshmitari n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjet e tij e konfirmon se raporti u mb\u00ebshtet\u00eb kryesisht n\u00eb mediat e Beogradit.<\/p>\n
\u201cVe\u00e7an\u00ebrisht, megjithat\u00eb, kur u p\u00ebrball me faktin se burimi i vet\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin FDH u mb\u00ebshtet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pretendim q\u00eb ishte ricikluar n\u00eb P380 ishte \u201cMedia e Beogradit\u201d, d\u00ebshmitari v\u00ebrejti se ai nuk mund t\u00eb fliste p\u00ebr FDH-n\u00eb ose vendimet q\u00eb ata mor\u00ebn n\u00eb lidhje me burimet.39 N\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, ky koncesion \u00ebsht\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht arsyeja pse Mbrojtja parashtron se k\u00ebrkohej nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim i pavarur i burimeve t\u00eb tyre, pavar\u00ebsisht se sa e itua ishte marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia profesionale midis dy organizatave ose individ\u00ebve t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0thuhet n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Ben Emmerson.<\/p>\n
Avokati i Kadri Veselit q\u00eb e kishte marr\u00eb n\u00eb pyetje p\u00ebr or\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00ebra Abrahamsin, tregoi n\u00eb detaje se shumica e k\u00ebtij raporti nd\u00ebrtohej pa intervista me d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebt apo viktimat.<\/p>\n
\u201cN\u00eb total, P380 p\u00ebrmban 34 citate. Midis tyre, vet\u00ebm tre citate i referohen intervistave ose bisedave q\u00eb ka kryer vet\u00eb personeli i HRW \u2013 asnj\u00ebri prej t\u00eb cil\u00ebve nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb viktim\u00eb apo d\u00ebshmitar i krimeve. Media \u2013 private dhe shtet\u00ebrore \u2013 si dhe jo -Organizatat qeveritare p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb shumic\u00ebn d\u00ebrrmuese, n\u00ebse jo t\u00eb gjitha, t\u00eb referencave t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshira n\u00eb P380. Ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht, 11 referenca i jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb raportit t\u00eb lartp\u00ebrmendur t\u00eb FDH Spotlight nga 5 gusht 1998, i cili, nga ana tjet\u00ebr, citon burime t\u00eb tjera dyt\u00ebsore, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb vet\u00eb \u201cFDH\u201d dhe \u201cMedien e Beogradit\u201d\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0thuhet n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb Emmerson.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
K\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb avokatit t\u00eb Kadri Veselit, Ben Emmerson, lidhur me raportin e ekspertit Fred Abrahams, i jan\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjur nga Prokuroria e Hag\u00ebs. Prokuroria ka theksuar se nuk ka asnj\u00eb arsye q\u00eb ky raport t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohet nga provat e procesit, pavar\u00ebsisht se Abrahams deklaroi q\u00eb n\u00eb raportin e tij ka pasur burime nga mediat dhe institucionet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":33510,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1146],"tags":[1599],"yoast_head":"\n